翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ New South Wales State Emergency Service ・ New South Wales State Heritage Register ・ New South Wales State Plan ・ New South Wales Student Representative Council ・ New South Wales Suburban Rugby Union ・ New South Wales Swifts ・ New South Wales Systems Biology Initiative ・ New South Wales Teachers Federation ・ New South Wales Tulloch double deck carriage stock ・ New South Wales Tulloch suburban carriage stock ・ New South Wales Typographical Association ・ New South Wales U set ・ New South Wales v Commonwealth ・ New South Wales v Commonwealth (1915) ・ New South Wales v Commonwealth (1990) ・ New South Wales v Commonwealth (2006) ・ New South Wales v Fahy ・ New South Wales Waratahs ・ New South Wales Waratahs (field hockey) ・ New South Wales wine ・ New South Wales Women's Rugby League ・ New South Wales Women's rugby league team ・ New South Wales Writers' Centre ・ New South Wales X10 class locomotive ・ New South Wales X100 class locomotive ・ New South Wales X200 class locomotive ・ New South Wales Xplorer ・ New South Wales XPT ・ New South Wales Z11 class locomotive ・ New South Wales Z12 class locomotive Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク New South Wales v Commonwealth (2006) ： ウィキペディア英語版 New South Wales v Commonwealth (2006) is a landmark decision of the High Court of Australia, which held that the federal government's ''WorkChoices'' legislation was a valid exercise of constitutional power. In essence, the majority (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon and Crennan JJ) found the Constitution's corporations power capable of sustaining the legislative framework, while the conciliation and arbitration and Territories powers were also seen as supporting parts of the law. Further, the majority also held that the legislation permissibly limited State powers and did not interfere with State constitutions or functioning. A minority (Kirby and Callinan JJ) dissented. The case attracted considerable attention before, during and after the High Court decision was delivered on 14 November 2006. As a legal precedent, it may signify a shift in the distribution of power from the States to the Federal Parliament. Thus, the decision could well be regarded by historians of Australian federalism as an important legal landmark. ==Background to the case== From at least 1904 through to the last decade of the 20th Century, the constitutional basis of most Australian federal industrial relations legislation was the conciliation and arbitration power. In general, the Federal Parliament would exercise this power to establish an independent tribunal to set minimum terms and conditions of employment by the compulsory conciliation and arbitration of interstate industrial disputes. Another important historical fact of note is that for much of the 20th Century, the States and Territories had their own workplace relations legislation setting terms and conditions for employees not affected by the arbitration of interstate industrial disputes. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「New South Wales v Commonwealth (2006)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.